营销科学学报 ›› 2024, Vol. 4 ›› Issue (1): 79-106.

• • 上一篇    下一篇

并购的品牌效应:公司品牌架构与并购的长期绩效

蒋廉雄,刘泽云,蓝紫苑   

  1. 蒋廉雄,中山大学马克思主义学院教授,E-mail:pusjlk@mail.sysu.edu.cn  刘泽云,中山大学国际金融学院硕士研究生,E-mail:1790984519@qq.com  蓝紫苑,通信作者,中山大学国际金融学院博士研究生,E-mail:lanzy5@mail2.sysu.edu.cn
  • 出版日期:2024-01-16 发布日期:2024-05-30
  • 基金资助:
    本研究得到国家自然科学基金项目(编号:71972190、 72272012)和广东省自然科学基金项目(编号:2021A1515011936) 的资助,特此一并致谢。

Brand Effects on Merger &Acquisition: Corporate Brand Architecture and the Long-term Performance of the Acquire

Jiang Lianxiong,Liu Zeyun,Lan Ziyuan   

  1. Jiang Lianxiong, School of Marxism,Sun Yat-sen University;  Liu Zeyun, International School of Finance &Business,Sun Yat-sen University;  Lan Ziyuan, International School of Finance &Business,Sun Yat-sen University;
  • Online:2024-01-16 Published:2024-05-30

摘要: 本文根据品牌架构战略理论,构建品牌架构匹配度概念,对主并方与被并方的品牌架构一致与不一致及其各种匹配组合与主并方的并购长期绩效的关系建立研究假设,以2010—2016年中国A股上市公司中100%股权并购的公司作为研究对象,以同期未参与并购的A股上市公司为基础建立对照组,构建面板数据,对其进行了实证分析。结果表明:主并方的并购长期绩效在主并方与被并方的品牌架构不一致时比二者一致时更高;当主并方与被并方的品牌架构一致时,双方都是多品牌架构时,主并方的并购长期绩效较双方都是公司品牌架构时更高;当主并方与被并方的品牌架构不一致时,无论双方是何种品牌架构,各种匹配组合结果均为混合品牌架构类型,这些组合情形下的主并方的并购长期绩效无显著差异。此外,并购双方的品牌地位差距等因素对并购的长期绩效具有异质性影响。本文将并购的品牌效应研究从双方公司品牌系统的某些特征对并购短期绩效的影响研究拓展到双方公司品牌系统的匹配对并购长期绩效的影响研究,为企业更好地选择并购的目标公司,以实现更好的并购长期绩效提供了有价值的指引。

关键词: 并购, 品牌架构, 品牌资产, 公司绩效, 公司价值

Abstract: Based on the Brand Architecture Strategy Theory, this paper puts forward the concept of brand architecture fitness and proposes the research hypotheses through theoretically analyzing how different brand architecture combinations between the acquiring party and the acquired party of M&A affecting the long-term performance of the acquirer. The empirical test uses the data of Chinese A-share listed companies which complete  100%equity M&A from 2010 to 2016, and establishes a control group based on the A-share listed companies that do not participate in M&A at the same time. With the panel data and multiple empirical analysis method, the results show that the long-term performance of the acquirer is higher when the brand architectures of both sides are inconsistent than that of both are consistent. More specifically, under the consistent situations, the long- term performance with house of brands architecture of both sides of M&A is higher than that with branded house architecture of both sides; while under the inconsistent conditions, no matter what brand architectures the both sides of M&A are, there are no significant differences in the long-term performances after M&A. In addition, there exist heterogeneous effects due to the factors such as brand equity gap between the two sides of M&A. This study extends the research on the brand effects of M&A from the impact of brand architecture characteristics of both sides on the short-term performance of M&A to the influence of the brand architecture fitness of both sides on the long-term performance, which provides valuable guidances for enterprises to better select the M&A target companies and gain higher long-term performances after M&A.

Key words: merger and acquisition, brand architecture, brand equity, firm performance, firm value