营销科学学报 ›› 2015, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (3): 29-44.

• 论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

非对称依赖渠道关系中的契约治理和投机行为:市场不确定性与政府支持的调节作用

杜楠,张闯,夏春玉   

  1. 杜楠,东北财经大学工商管理学院博士研究生,E-mail: david549@163.com。
    张闯,东北财经大学工商管理学院教授、博士生导师,E-mail: blackzhang317@163.com。
    夏春玉,东北财经大学工商管理学院教授、博士生导师,E-mail: xiachunyu@dufe.edu.cn。
    本研究得到了教育部哲学社会科学研究重大课题攻关项目(12JZD025)、国家自然科学基金项目(71202038)和教育部新世纪优秀人才项目(NCET-13-0708)的资助,特此感谢。非常感谢三位匿名评审专家和专业主编提出的建设性修改意见。
  • 出版日期:2015-09-01 发布日期:2015-11-20

The Effect of Contract Governance on Opportunistic Behavior of the Two Parties in Channel Relationships with Dependence Asymmetry: The Moderating Role of Market Uncertainty and Government Support

Du Nan, Zhang Chuang, Xia Chunyu   

  1. School of Business Administration, Dongbei University of Finance and Economics
  • Online:2015-09-01 Published:2015-11-20

摘要:

在依赖结构不对称的渠道关系中,契约治理机制能否有效抑制关系双方的投机行为尚未得到现有研究关注。针对这一理论问题,本研究以契约型农产品渠道为背景检验了契约治理机制对渠道关系双方(农户与收购商)投机行为的影响作用,并进一步考察了市场不确定性和政府支持两个重要环境变量的调节作用。研究发现,即使是在依赖结构高度不对称的渠道关系中,明确的契约对渠道关系双方的投机行为都具有直接的抑制作用。同时,市场不确定性和政府支持对依赖结构不对称的关系双方的投机行为存在不同的调节作用。具体来说,市场不确定性会强化契约明确性对农户(依赖程度较高的一方)投机行为的抑制作用,但在契约明确性与收购商(依赖程度较低的一方)投机行为之间的调节作用并不显著。此外,政府支持会削弱契约明确性对农户投机行为的抑制作用,但会加强契约明确性对收购商投机行为的抑制作用。文章最后对研究结果的理论意义进行了讨论,并给出了相应的管理建议,指出了未来的研究方向。

关键词: 契约明确性, 投机行为, 市场不确定性, 政府支持, 依赖结构不对称

Abstract:

In channel relationship with dependence asymmetry, it remains unanswered whether contract governance could curb the opportunistic behavior of two parties in the relationship. In the context of contractual channel of agriculture products, this study investigates the effect of contract governance on the opportunistic behavior of two parties (farmer and buyer) in channel relationships, as well as the moderating role of two important environmental variables, market uncertainty and government support. Findings show that, despite of dependence asymmetry, explicit contract can directly curb opportunistic behavior of two parties in channel relationships. Moreover, the market uncertainty and government support have different moderating roles. Specifically, market uncertainty strengthens the effect of explicit contract on farmer (the more dependent one) opportunistic behavior, but it does not moderate the effect of explicit contract on buyer (the less dependent one)opportunistic behavior. Additionally, government support weakens the effect of explicit contract on farmer opportunistic behavior, but strengthens the effect of explicit contract on buyer opportunistic behavior. Finally, this paper includes a discussion of the research findings, corresponding managerial suggestions and the future research directions.

Key words: contract explicitness, opportunistic behavior, market uncertainty, government support, dependence asymmetry