营销科学学报 ›› 2016, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (3): 18-35.

• 论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

商品陈列的画面效应 ——陈列秩序影响商品评价的机制与条件

叶巍岭,黄蓉,张子敬   

  1. 叶巍岭,上海财经大学国际工商管理学院副教授,E-mail: ye.weiling@shufe.edu.cn。
    黄蓉,上海财经大学国际工商管理学院副教授,E-mail:email_huangrong@163.com。
    张子敬,Robert H. Smith School of Business, Universityof Maryland硕士生,zijingzhang227@gmail.com。
  • 出版日期:2016-09-01 发布日期:2017-03-15
  • 基金资助:
    本项目受国家自然科学基金面上项目的资金支持,项目批准号71572103,项目名称“非正式控制在销售管理体系中的协同作用及其应用研究”。项目批准号71472115,项目名称“不同企业社会责任类型对消费者品牌评价的影响和机制研究”。

Pictorial effect in Product Layout: How does the Layout Orderness Influence the Consumer’s Product Evaluation, Mechanism and Condition

Weiling Ye, Rong Huang, Zijing Zhang   

  1. Weiling Ye, School of International Business Administration, Shanghai University of Finance and Economics.
    Rong Huang, School of International Business Administration, Shanghai University of Finance and Economics.
    Zijing Zhang, Robert H. Smith School of Business, University of Maryland.
  • Online:2016-09-01 Published:2017-03-15

摘要:

商品陈列的秩序是消费者进行商品评价的重要线索,为什么整齐的陈列(相较于凌乱的陈列)会有利于消费者对商品给出较高的质量预估?除了现有成果中已经发现的污染效应,本研究提出了“画面效应”的作用机制及条件: 当商品陈列整齐(相对于凌乱)时,消费者对陈列画面的态度更加积极正面,继而导致消费者对产品质量的预估评价也显著更高,这就是本研究定义的“画面效应”,其中,消费者对陈列画面的态度在画面效应中起到完全中介作用; 但是,画面效应并不总是会发生,产品外观重要性起到调节作用, 当消费者认为产品的外观不重要时,画面效应不发生,即凌乱与整齐的陈列不会引起消费者对陈列画面的态度差别,也不会引起消费者对产品质量预估评价的差异;而当产品的外观重要时,画面效应才会发生。这个研究在陈列秩序的产品污染和消费者污染效应之外,证明了“画面效应”的存在,对有关商品陈列的研究有理论贡献。在应用方面,这个研究给予零售现场管理关于“理货的必要性”更多的支持,并进一步回答了针对什么样的商品更应该花时间整理,保持商品陈列的整齐有序。

关键词: 陈列秩序, 货架陈列, 商品评价, 线索利用理论, 零售管理

Abstract:

Commodity display is an important cue for consumers’ prediction of the goods they purchase. Then why neat display (compared to messy one) of the commodity usually results in better product evaluation? Besides the contamination effect in literature, current research brings forward the existence and conditions of “the pictorial effect", i.e. when the goods are neatly displayed (relative to messily), consumer’s attitude toward the display becomes more positive, leading to a higher product evaluation, and the consumer’s attitudes toward display fully mediates the pictorial effect. However, the pictorial effect does not always occur, for the importance of the product appearance plays a moderator role in the effect. If consumer thinks the product appearance is not important, the pictorial effect could not be observed, which means there’s no difference in product evaluation between messy and neat display of the commodity, and only when the product appearance is important, does the pictorial effect occur. By 3 lab experiments, we proved the existence of "pictorial effect", making a theoretical contribution to the research in store display. And in application, current research supports “the necessity of tally” in the site management of retailing, and further answers the question as to what kind of product need more effort to be kept in good order in their displays.

Key words: display orderness, shelf display, product evaluation, cue utilization theory, retailing management