营销科学学报

• 论文 •    下一篇

消费者如何应对选择困难——选择困难的不同归因方式对折中效应的影响

丁瑛,徐菁,张影   

  1. 丁瑛,北京大学光华管理学院市场营销系博士研究生,Email: dingying@gsm.pku.edu.cn。
    徐菁,北京大学光华管理学院市场营销系副教授,Email: jingx@gsm.pku.edu.cn。
    张影,北京大学光华管理学院市场营销系教授,Email: yzhang@gsm.pku.edu.cn。
  • 出版日期:2012-09-01 发布日期:2013-03-26
  • 基金资助:

    非常感谢匿名评审专家对本文提出的宝贵的修改建议和意见。本研究得到优秀青年科学基金项目(71222205)的资助!特此致谢!

Why Is It So Difficult to Choose?The Impact of Diverging Inferences of Choice Difficulty on Choice Making

Ying Ding, Jing Xu, Ying Zhang   

  1. Guanghua School of Management, Peking University
  • Online:2012-09-01 Published:2013-03-26

摘要:

本文主要探讨对选择困难的不同归因方式如何影响消费者的选择偏好。通过两个实验,作者发现遇到选择困难时,将困难归因于选择本身重要性的消费者会更倾向于选择极端选项,而将困难归因于产品各属性重要性的消费者会更倾向于选择折中选项。文章还对这些发现的理论贡献和营销启示进行了讨论。

关键词: 选择困难, 折中效应, 极端选项, 归因方式

Abstract:

The current research investigates how different attributions of perceived choice difficulty influence consumers’ preference. The authors propose that the metacognitive experience of choice difficulty can be inferred by different reasons. Across two empirical experiments, it’s demonstrated that consumers who attribute the perceived choice difficulty to the importance of choice per se will be more likely to choose the extreme options. However, if the perceived choice difficulty is believed to be induced by the importance of product attributes, consumers will be more likely to choose the compromise option. A discussion of theoretical contributions and managerial implications is included in the end of the paper.

Key words: Choice Difficulty, Compromise Effect, Extreme Choice, Attribution